Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.5.6 #7778

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Open

fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.5.6 #7778

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+8 −8

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 7, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@portabletext/editor (source) ^1.5.5 -> ^1.5.6 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

portabletext/editor (@​portabletext/editor)

v1.5.6

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update react compiler dependencies 🤖 ✨ (#​383) (be449e1)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 3:52pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 3:52pm
test-compiled-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 3:52pm
test-next-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 3:52pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 3:52pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 7, 2024 3:52pm

@socket-security Socket Security
Copy link

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@portabletext/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2024

No changes to documentation

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Component Testing Report Updated Nov 7, 2024 3:47 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 46s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 32s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 39s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 10s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 33s 1 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 46s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 45s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 17s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/RangeDecoration.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 28s 9 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 46s 11 0 1
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2024

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:50:12 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest		 experiment
latency of this branch		 Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 15.6 efps (64ms) 15.9 efps (63ms) -1ms (-1.6%) ✅
article (body) 55.9 efps (18ms) 50.8 efps (20ms) +2ms (+10.1%) ✅
article (string inside object) 16.9 efps (59ms) 17.2 efps (58ms) -1ms (-1.7%) ✅
article (string inside array) 15.4 efps (65ms) 15.2 efps (66ms) +1ms (+1.5%) ✅
recipe (name) 28.6 efps (35ms) 29.4 efps (34ms) -1ms (-2.9%) ✅
recipe (description) 32.3 efps (31ms) 33.3 efps (30ms) -1ms (-3.2%) ✅
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (7ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) -1ms (-/-%) ✅
synthetic (title) 14.9 efps (67ms) 15.3 efps (66ms) -2ms (-2.2%) ✅
synthetic (string inside object) 15.5 efps (65ms) 15.2 efps (66ms) +2ms (+2.3%) ✅

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 64ms 70ms 79ms 220ms 509ms 13.5s
article (body) 18ms 21ms 26ms 301ms 460ms 6.2s
article (string inside object) 59ms 65ms 78ms 282ms 566ms 9.1s
article (string inside array) 65ms 73ms 81ms 113ms 709ms 9.3s
recipe (name) 35ms 36ms 40ms 80ms 2ms 8.9s
recipe (description) 31ms 33ms 35ms 90ms 10ms 6.1s
recipe (instructions) 7ms 9ms 10ms 27ms 11ms 3.4s
synthetic (title) 67ms 72ms 87ms 392ms 1462ms 18.1s
synthetic (string inside object) 65ms 67ms 71ms 262ms 787ms 9.3s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 63ms 70ms 105ms 317ms 597ms 14.0s
article (body) 20ms 26ms 31ms 207ms 346ms 6.6s
article (string inside object) 58ms 61ms 69ms 396ms 575ms 9.1s
article (string inside array) 66ms 72ms 81ms 218ms 911ms 9.7s
recipe (name) 34ms 37ms 61ms 84ms 4ms 8.7s
recipe (description) 30ms 32ms 35ms 55ms 0ms 5.9s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 9ms 10ms 11ms 0ms 3.3s
synthetic (title) 66ms 71ms 77ms 461ms 1419ms 14.5s
synthetic (string inside object) 66ms 70ms 83ms 349ms 1168ms 10.0s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@stipsan stipsan added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 7, 2024
Any commits made after this event will not be merged.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stipsan stipsan stipsan approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🤖 bot 📦 deps
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@stipsan